Lara Schmidt vs Emily Seibold Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Schmidt vs E. Seibold

Lara Schmidt
GER
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
25
-
Height
-
669
C. Rank
462
478
Best Rank
442
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Emily Seibold
GER
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
25
-
Height
-
669
C. Rank
462
478
Best Rank
442
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Schmidt 1 - 0 Seibold
They have played 3 sets in total, with Lara Schmidt winning 2 and Emily Seibold winning 1. The last match between Lara Schmidt and Emily Seibold was at the W75 Ismaning, 04-11-2024, Round: Q3, Surface: Carpet, with Lara Schmidt getting the victory 6-1 4-6 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schmidt | 1 |
| Seibold | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W75 Ismaning(11-04-24)
Lara Schmidt
6
4
6
Emily Seibold
1
6
4
L. Schmidt vs E. Seibold H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.72% (120-112) | Career Total W/L | 54.52% (199-166) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Schmidt vs E. Seibold Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lara Schmidt has won 42.86% of points on their second serve, while Emily Seibold has won 35.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lara Schmidt, in recent form, has won 51.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Emily Seibold has won 49.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.43% and 34.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lara Schmidt has saved 38.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emily Seibold has saved 47.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lara Schmidt has won 41.18% of matches played (W/L 7/10), with Emily Seibold winning 60.00% (W/L 36/24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lara Schmidt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 39/24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 63/74). Emily Seibold has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 38/28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 10/15).
- Player level: In the last year, Lara Schmidt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 5/4), where as Emily Seibold has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.10% of matches (W/L 23/18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lara Schmidt winning 1 times and Emily Seibold being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lara Schmidt winning 2 and Emily Seibold winning 1.
- The last match between Lara Schmidt and Emily Seibold was at the W75 Ismaning, 04-11-2024, Round: Q3, Surface: Carpet, with Lara Schmidt getting the victory 6-1 4-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lara Schmidt has played against opponents with an average rank of 399.35 while Emily Seibold has played against players with an average rank of 428.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lara Schmidt has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emily Seibold has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lara Schmidt has converted 26.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emily Seibold has converted 40.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Lara Schmidt vs Emily Seibold Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Schmidt vs E. Seibold H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:58:0 | Average Match Time | 1:58:0 |
| 89% (88/99) | 1st Serve % | 80% (64/80) |
| 64% (56/88) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (33/64) |
| 27% (3/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8/16) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (4/9) |
| 49% (39/80) | Return Points Win % | 40% (40/99) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Schmidt 40%, Seibold 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Schmidt 57%, Seibold 59%.
Break Points Saved %: Schmidt 42%, Seibold 54%.
L. Schmidt Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(0) 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 ret. | ||
E. Seibold Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 3-2 ret. | ||

L. Schmidt vs E. Seibold Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.72% (120/112) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.52% (199/166) |
| 52.54% (269/243) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.21% (445/361) |
| 51.78% (2352/2190) | Games Win/Loss | 53.40% (3751/3274) |
| 61.90% (39/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.58% (38/28) |
| 45.99% (63/74) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.89% (147/116) |
| 56.25% (18/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.89% (14/22) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 50 | Aces Total | 464 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 569 | Total Double Faults | 1057 |
| 1:26:23 | Average Match Time | 1:19:31 |
| 505.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 468.65 |
| 71% (8581/12077) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10481/17300) |
| 56% (4776/8581) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (6313/10481) |
| 42% (1477/3496) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3004/6819) |
| 50% (861/1734) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1239/2460) |
| 49% (5932/12159) | Return Points Win % | 48% (8647/17948) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.46% (56/62) | Challenger W/L | 47.80% (87/95) |
| 57.14% (64/48) | Futures W/L | 61.20% (112/71) |
| 53% (115/218) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (196/350) |
| 0% (0/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 30% (9/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (18/50) |
| 45% (25/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (41/85) |
| 82% (125/103) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (202/180) |
| 17% (125/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (202/22) |
| 16% (107/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (163/21) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 21 Dec, 06:30 PM
PredictionSun, 21 Dec, 10:00 AM
PredictionSun, 21 Dec, 08:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

20 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

20 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Prizmic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Engel H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
Top Predictions Today
Learner Tien
Alexander Blockx
Sohyun Park
Ksenia Efremova
Soha Sadiq
Chandana PotugariSee All Today’s Tennis Predictions
20:00
H2H 0-0
08:35
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0